Skip to content
Sections
Oregon Conservation Network Holding Politicians Accountable Training Opportunities Environmental News Learn About the Issues
 
Looking for OLCV?

Click here for our sister organization, OLCV.

 

2005 Common Agenda

Document Actions
2005 Common Agenda

Common Agenda for the 2005 Legislature

 

Since its inception in 1995, the Oregon Conservation Network (OCN) has worked to unite conservation groups from around the state in an effort to protect Oregon's environmental heritage in the state legislature.  The OCN has grown into a coalition of approximately 80 conservation groups with a combined membership of more than 100,000 Oregonians working to protect Oregon’s quality of life.

 

For the first time, a coalition of OCN member groups developed a list of environmental priorities for the Oregon legislature. This “Common Agenda,” outlined below, reflects the OCN’s view of the seven most important actions decision-makers can take in 2005. 

 

Protect the Oregon Dream: Stop Weakening Environmental Protections

The 2005 Oregon legislature should pass no law that weakens environmental safeguards.  For a decade, the legislature focused much of its energy on “rolling back” existing Oregon laws that promote clean air and water, hold polluters accountable, conserve farm and forestland, and protect wildlife. This year, the legislature should restore Oregon’s standing as a national environmental leader, based on the understanding that a healthy environment and a strong economy go hand in hand. 

 

Support Oregon’s Economy: Invest in Preserving our Quality of Life

The 2005 legislature can begin to provide the long-term investments needed to create jobs in hard-hit rural areas -- through projects that protect fish and wildlife and repair Oregon’s natural infrastructure. Investing in conservation projects lays the foundation for economic and environmental success by immediately putting money and jobs into rural communities and addresses conservation needs in ways that avoid additional regulatory restrictions on Oregon businesses and landowners. In 1998, Oregon voters overwhelmingly passed Measure 66, which amended Oregon’s constitution and dedicated 15% of the state’s lottery revenues in conservation projects. But since the ballot measure passed, the Legislature has instead used the millions of dollars to pay for other agency programs. Repeated use of dedicated conservation funds for ongoing operations of state agencies undermines the credibility of state government and the Legislature.

 

Close the Toxic Pollution Loophole to Restore Safe and Healthy Rivers

Industrial pollution, containing untreated toxic chemicals, is currently being pumped into Oregon’s rivers and streams at dangerous levels. A “loophole” in existing law encourages polluters to dump untreated pollutants such as arsenic, lead, and mercury into Oregon’s rivers at levels known to be toxic to people and wildlife. This dumping creates toxic areas in our rivers.  Some of these areas are as large as two football fields, yet state authorities do not warn the public where they are located - even within popular rivers such as the Willamette.  The 2005 Legislature has the opportunity to fix this serious problem to restore safe and healthy rivers for Oregon.

 

Put Oregon’s Fishermen Back to Work: Create Marine Nurseries
Due to over-fishing, Oregon's marine fish populations have become so small that the government has resorted to buying out commercial fishermen to prevent further population declines. Scientists have found that protecting certain areas in the ocean can help restore fish populations. Establishing “marine reserves” is like creating a nursery, allowing adult fish to grow and reproduce in abundance, while their offspring help replenish populations in areas where fishing is allowed outside the reserve boundaries. The sooner a system of reserves is created in Oregon, the sooner local fisherman can get back to their jobs. As an added benefit to the coast’s economy, marine parks, where education and recreation would be emphasized, would help boost coastal tourism.

 

Biodiesel Solutions for Oregon’s Farmers and Children
Diesel exhaust, the #1 air toxin in Oregon, causes cancer and triggers asthma in children and other vulnerable people. Biodiesel, a substitute for petroleum diesel, is a nontoxic, renewable fuel made from plants. Biodiesel significantly reduces air pollution while creating new markets for Oregon’s farmers and promoting new industrial jobs. By promoting biodiesel, and establishing a fund to demonstrate biodiesel use in school buses, the 2005 Legislature can reduce unhealthy diesel exhaust and help Oregon’s farmers. Diesel school buses deserve the legislature’s immediate attention because of the high risk diesel exhaust poses for children who ride the bus.

 

Take Back Our Right to Know: Implement Oregon’s Pesticide Use Reporting Law

Pesticides are widely used throughout Oregon, not only on farms and forests, but also in schools, parks, roadsides, hospitals, grocery stores, and public buildings. In 2003, there were 153 known cases of pesticide poisonings in Oregon. Tracking pesticide use is critical for protecting human health and preventing future poisonings. Five years ago, the Oregon Legislature voted overwhelmingly to pass a landmark “pesticide use reporting” law. Today, however, there is still no information about where, when, how much or how pesticides are being sprayed in our communities because the Legislature withheld funding from the program. Because of the risks associated with the use of pesticides, the Oregon Department of Human Services supports the reporting system. The 2005 Legislature should fully fund the program to protect the health of all Oregonians.

 

Protecting Land-Use Planning for Oregon’s Future

The integrity of Oregon's landmark land-use planning system is at risk due to the passage of 2004’s Ballot Measure 37. Measure 37 was approved by voters for its no-nonsense language of providing “fairness” to property owners. Its result, however, may be the wholesale elimination of Oregon’s land use planning system – an effect that would have serious, long-term, negative impacts on Oregon’s economic growth, neighborhoods, farmland protection, and environmental health. The Oregon Legislature must take a stand for both property owners and the long-term health of the state by finding a solution which gives property owners the “fairness” and redress they sought under Measure 37, without the elimination of a program that has shaped the beautiful Oregon we know and love.



powered by Plone | site by ONE/Northwest